Why the government should do an IPO for NPCI

17 September, 20207 min
0
Google Preferred Source Badge
Share
Getting your Trinity Audio player ready...
Why the government should do an IPO for NPCI

Why read this story?

Editor's note: India’s Unified Payments Interface, or UPI, has gained name and fame across the world—perhaps for the first time that Indian tech has been hailed for developing an innovative platform, as opposed to software services. Launched by the National Payments Corporation of India, or NPCI, in 2016, the instantaneous digital payments platform has witnessed a stunning growth, from processing Rs 3 crore worth of transactions in August 2016 to Rs 3 lakh crore in August 2020. In just four years, UPI alone accounts for close to 50% of all retail payments processed in India, in terms of transaction volumes. UPI may have attracted many a plaudit to NPCI, but the fact is that the non-profit company, which manages most retail payments systems in the country, is credited with launching a number of other platforms. These include the Immediate Payment Service, the RuPay card network, the Bharat Bill Payment System, the Aadhaar-enabled Payment System and FasTAG. Licensed by the Reserve Bank of India and controlled by a consortium of state-owned and private-sector banks, NPCI was set up in 2008 to operate retail …

You may also like

Business
Story image

IPO is imperative but no panacea for Manipal Hospitals

A public listing will help clean up the hospital chain’s balance sheet after the costly Sahyadri acquisition. But depressed metrics, integration risks and lofty valuations make this far from a clean turnaround story.

Internet
Story image

boAt’s best days are behind it

The consumer electronics startup jumped through the ranks to become India’s top audio and smartwatch brand. Just as quickly, the IPO-bound company appears to be losing steam and its comeback looks uncertain.

Business
Story image

HDFC Bank’s supposed can of worms needs to be opened and investigated

Atanu Chakraborty’s resignation does not appear as damaging as the bank’s response to it. The ‘all is well’ narrative needs an independent audit.