Why Nirmala Sitharaman is wrong in chiding the corporate sector
The government and big capitalists are complicit in the state of the Indian economy, where masses of people have been pushed into an acute livelihood crisis.

Why read this story?
Editor's note: Recently, Union finance minister Nirmala Sitharaman asked Indian capitalists: “...since 2019, I have been hearing that industry doesn’t find [conditions] conducive, so I brought the corporation tax rate down… I would want to know from the Indian industry why they are hesitant [to invest]… I want to hear from India Inc., what’s stopping you when countries and industries abroad think this is the place to be now?” When I heard Sitharaman’s question, I was reminded of the infamous Say’s law. In the late 19th and early 20th centuries, Say’s law was the hegemonic economic philosophy. French economist Jean-Baptiste Say (1767-1832) argued that supply creates its own demand, and governments need not play any role in intervening or investing in the economy to take it close to full employment. Consequently, governments refrained from investing in the economy even when growth was slowing. However, Say’s law was confined to the dustbin of history by the Great Depression of 1929, which showed that supply may not create its own demand and governments may need to step in and pump-prime the economy to generate …
More in Chaos
You may also like
2025: A terrific year for macroeconomic management of the economy
The economy grew strongly despite several headwinds, with the policy responses mostly fitting the need. How sustainable is the growth rate, though?
India needs a solid, long-term plan to soften US tariff blow
The shocks to employment, formalization and sectoral growth can seriously hurt India’s ongoing economic transformation. Here’s a practical guide to offsetting US export losses.
GST Bachat Utsav is a colossal oversell
Beyond marginal savings for consumers, the promises held out by the GST cuts are a tall order. Maybe even delusional.








