Consolidating the party-state’s control over business

China’s playbook—that loyal capital will be treated nicely, but any perceptions of disloyalty or contention will be dealt with punitively—is one that we have seen over and over again across the world.

14 November, 20228 min
0
Consolidating the party-state’s control over business

Why read this story?

Editor's note: The most defining moment in Chinese business-state relations in recent memory was the public disappearance of Jack Ma, the billionaire founder of Alibaba, right before his fintech company, Ant Group, was poised for a massive public listing.  In late October 2020, Ant Group was valued at over $300 billion, larger than many of the largest banks in both China and the US. Its IPO, which was supposed to happen jointly between Shanghai and Hong Kong, could have been the largest in recent financial history. But then Ma vanished. In the days leading up to his disappearance (on 24 October, to be precise), Ma had been publicly critical of China’s financial regulators and their conservatism regarding collateral requirements for lending, particularly through fintech platforms. He had criticized their “pawnshop mentality,” asserting that new actors in the country’s financial sector (including Ant Group’s Alipay platform) needed to be bolder in extending credit to the collateral-poor, since the country’s conservative large financial actors are often reluctant to offer credit to innovative small companies and individuals. Clearly the public criticism was a step too …

You may also like

Business
Story image

What China’s recent Middle East tour says about their ties

China’s expanding influence in the GCC region comes with its own set of opportunities—and constraints shaped by America’s influence in the Gulf.

Business
Story image

The pressures on Tadawul index and Saudi’s attempt to fix them

Saudi Arabia’s primary market has been facing challenges despite a rather busy IPO pipeline.

Chaos
Story image

Annus horribilis: 2025 was the year India learned it wasn't indispensable

It is the logical consequence of foreign policy built on a decade of illusion rather than the realities of power. The question is whether anyone in the government has the courage to admit it.