How Ajit Doval failed as the national security advisor

And why Brahma Chellaney should replace him.

14 March, 20229 min
0
Google Preferred Source Badge
Share
Getting your Trinity Audio player ready...
How Ajit Doval failed as the national security advisor

Why read this story?

Editor's note: Who is the second most powerful figure in the Indian government? If you answered Amit Shah, you are wrong. That position belongs to Ajit Doval, India’s national security advisor. In the hierarchy of the Indian state, the office of the NSA, inaugurated in the 1990s, has evolved into an institution that is second only in stature to the Prime Minister’s Office. Within its relatively short history, Doval—who was granted a second successive term with a promotion to the cabinet by the prime minister three years ago—has consolidated himself as the most predominant bureaucrat in India’s republican history. What sets Doval apart is not only his influence but also his fame: in the annals of Indian officialdom, he is the first celebrity. More than a celebrity, actually: trailed by groupies, fawned over by Delhi hacks and memorialized in memes, Doval is closer to a head of a personality cult. And his biography, as detailed by members of the cult, is a fabulous chronicle of impossibly intrepid bravado. There he is, at the beginning of the 1980s, going for a stroll inside …

You may also like

Business
Story image

How Gulf aviation is navigating the Iran war

The most profitable airline carriers are having to contend with the new realities of flying in the face of missiles and drones.

Chaos
Story image

Iran war: New attacks engulf the UAE, as the conflict drags on

Dubai International Airport and Fujairah port were once again disrupted on Monday. Separately, there is a new warning that this conflict could result in the region’s worst crises in decades.

Chaos
Story image

The Gulf Report: Day 11 of US, Israel and Iran war

The IMF asks policymakers to prepare for the unthinkable and warns that the new Mideast conflict poses inflation risks; separately, a war is also being waged on unverified information across the Mideast.