PayU’s India play is too complex for RBI’s liking

The Naspers-owned company is at a loss to explain its convoluted ownership structure, even as it grapples with the regulator’s reluctance to grant it a payment aggregator licence.

30 March, 20239 min
0
PayU’s India play is too complex for RBI’s liking

Why read this story?

Editor's note: It’s been a tough few months for PayU India. In October, Prosus, its Amsterdam-based parent company, backed out of a $4.7 billion deal to acquire rival BillDesk. Also, last year, the central bank’s digital lending guidelines kicked in, forcing LazyPay (PayU’s buy now pay later arm) to rework its operations, like most other pure-play online financiers. In December, the firm also fired nearly 150 employees citing “organizational realignment”, The Economic Times reported.    The last straw was in January, when the Reserve Bank of India reportedly rejected the firm’s plea to carry on operations as a payment gateway. Last month, the RBI released a list of over 50 existing and new entities that were granted payment aggregator licenses. PayU was among the four existing firms that didn’t make the list, apart from Paytm Payments, Freecharge and Tapits Technologies. The rejection comes as a blow to PayU. The fintech firm, which provides online payment services for customers across Europe, Africa, Asia, the Middle East and Latin America, counts India among its most crucial operations. The country accounts for almost half the volumes …

You may also like

Business
Story image

CSB Bank’s deposits are a ticking time bomb

The Kerala-based bank has been chasing costly and risky bulk term deposits amid tanking profitability.

Business
Story image

Yes Bank’s succession problem is a board problem

As Prashant Kumar’s term runs out, boardroom fault lines have left the lender with no clarity on its next CEO—spooking investors and drawing the RBI’s ire.

Business
Story image

Q3 earnings lay bare $5 billion migraine for four of India’s top banks

While the earnings have been encouraging, the real challenge lies in addressing the slowing deposit growth and leadership uncertainty.