Should RBI treat Reliance as a ‘Big Tech’?
If the central bank is consistent in its cautious approach to technology majors offering financial services, it could oppose Reliance’s fintech ambitions.
Why read this story?
Editor's note: Last month, Reliance Industries announced that it will demerge its fledgling financial services business, rename it as Jio Financial Services and list it on the bourses. The Mukesh Ambani-led conglomerate’s expansion into the financial services sector under the Jio brand makes perfect sense. The oil-to-telecom behemoth can leverage its vast scale, high credit ratings and brand value to distribute high-profit margin financial products and raise funds easily. Moreover, India’s underserved financial services market offers a unique opportunity for Reliance to disrupt this space. The company said the regulatory approval to begin operations as a non-banking financial company is in place. It was also announced that Jio Financial Services will raise funds to provide adequate regulatory capital for lending to consumers and merchants, as well as incubate other verticals such as insurance, payments, digital broking and asset management. In this context, I’d like to draw your attention to a research paper published by the Reserve Bank of India on 17 October—four days before Reliance’s announcement. Titled “‘Bigtechs’ in the Financial Domain: Balancing Competition and Stability”, it has been authored by four …
More in Internet
You may also like
Reliance’s battery plans run into a China wall
Mukesh Ambani’s $10-billion bet faces a harsh reality: much of the clean-energy stack still sits overwhelmingly in Chinese hands.
Growth alone isn’t enough, Waaree needs to do more
The solar module maker’s investors want proof of its durability in the face of a leadership change and a costly push into energy storage.
Why IndusInd Bank promoter Ashok Hinduja was never really in the dark
As the private lender reeled from serial scandals, Hinduja insisted he was merely a shareholder. Board-level links, conflicts of interest and regulatory blind spots suggest otherwise.
