How Sameer Gehlaut is detoxifying Indiabulls
The group’s founder and chairman is paring his holdings and stepping away from the driver’s seat. Will it help Indiabulls chart a new course?
Why read this story?
Editor's note: Not once. Sameer Gehlaut failed twice. That must have hurt someone who is used to having his way. Unable to get a banking licence, the Indiabulls Group founder and chairman has now changed tack. Gehlaut is stepping away even as the Indiabulls Group is charting a new course after two decades of operating in the real estate and shadow banking sectors. The group, which started as an online brokerage firm in 1999, expanded into lending, real estate and power over time; recently it has added pharmaceuticals and healthcare. Among all these verticals, the group’s flagship entities are Indiabulls Housing Finance Ltd (IBHFL), Dhani Services Ltd (formerly Indiabulls Ventures) and Indiabulls Real Estate Ltd (IBREL). Their combined market capitalization stands at over Rs 17,300 crore as on date. It is no secret that Gehlaut always wanted to turn IBHFL into a bank. The company's first attempt was in 2010, when the Reserve Bank of India announced that it would hand out new banking licences. While IBHFL subsequently backed out, RBI went on to grant 23 new licences in the following years, …
More in Business
You may also like
RBI wants IndusInd Bank promoters, the Hindujas, cut to size
After successive controversies and growing unease over promoter influence, the central bank is reshaping the lender—starting with management, moving to its board and tightening the screws on ownership.
Conglomerates, duopolies and domination hamper India
The domination of a few business groups—conglomerates—is a defining feature of the country’s economy. This has been enabled by policy, leading to stifled innovation and hindered progress. All of this, in turn, exacerbates inequalities.
WeWork India: the IPO that could have been so much more
The co-working giant’s initial public offering is a missed opportunity that prioritizes promoter interests at the expense of incoming shareholders. Given this, the tepid investor interest is no surprise.