Making mutual funds accountable, SEBI style

The new rule that executives need to invest 20% of their pay into their own funds has sparked an uproar. Will the regulator stand its ground?

6 May, 202115 min
0
Google Preferred Source Badge
Share
Getting your Trinity Audio player ready...
Making mutual funds accountable, SEBI style

Why read this story?

Editor's note: After years of trying to make mutual fund house executives accountable for the performance of their funds, the Securities and Exchange Board of India finally bit the bullet last week by putting out a circular, which despite being muddled, set the cat among the pigeons.  The 28 April circular from SEBI states, among other things, that 20% of the salaries of key mutual fund house executives should be invested in units of the schemes over which they have oversight or are managed by them. As with almost any reform, the industry is unhappy. But if they’re looking for someone to blame, it should be Franklin Templeton India. Clearly the measure is a fallout of the crisis triggered by the asset management company shutting down its suite of six debt mutual fund schemes in April last year, effectively dragging the entire industry into SEBI’s crosshairs. We have tracked the sordid saga in a series of stories on how key officials put their own interest ahead of investors when the schemes were shuttered and how the fund managers doled out preferential treatment …

You may also like

Business
Story image

SEBI amps up focus on commodity derivatives amid rising investor interest

The market regulator is once again considering allowing colocation in the segment to pave the way for a smooth trading experience as commodity derivatives are drawing investors in hordes.

Business
Story image

IPO pipeline likely to stall despite SEBI flexibility

Promoters balk at smaller issues and uncertain pricing, choosing to wait out volatility.

Business
Story image

MFs hold up India’s IPO market, their investors foot the bill

As retail interest in public issuances fades, mutual funds are filling the gap—funding promoter exits and delivering subpar returns to the very investors they represent.