SEBI wants startups to name their promoters

Founders of multiple tech companies avoid being classified as promoters when they list but continue to call the shots. The regulator aims to fix that.

9 March, 20237 min
0
SEBI wants startups to name their promoters

Why read this story?

Editor's note: The Securities and Exchange Board of India wants founders with a 10% stake in their companies at the time of an IPO to classify themselves as promoters, according to a report in The Financial Express. The regulator’s move, if it takes effect, could have a bearing on a bunch of startups planning public issues of shares. With private equity investors holding the bulk of shares in many of them, founder stakes have come down to single digits. This will make it difficult to identify a promoter, and possibly delay the process. Also, there is no clarity on whether the new rule will allow clubbing together of founders to be counted as a single promoter. And, finally, can a founder opt out of being called a promoter if they pare their stake before an IPO? In 2019, faced with low founder/promoter stake in startups applying for IPOs, SEBI began drafting fresh rules. The rules allowed these startups to list as professionally managed companies, or PMCs, without anyone being classified as a promoter. It is under these rules that startups like Paytm, …

You may also like

Business
Story image

RBI wants IndusInd Bank promoters, the Hindujas, cut to size

After successive controversies and growing unease over promoter influence, the central bank is reshaping the lender—starting with management, moving to its board and tightening the screws on ownership.

Business
Story image

How India’s retail shareholders are being left holding the can

Swiggy and Ola Electric’s plans to return to the public markets soon after big-bang IPOs leave investors with dilution, little prospect of returns and plenty of questions.

Internet
Story image

Can SEBI get a good social media team for investor education?

With social media becoming a crucial source of financial guidance, it doesn’t help that many first-time investors remain strikingly unaware of regulations meant to protect them against unregistered entities.