SEBI wants startups to name their promoters

Founders of multiple tech companies avoid being classified as promoters when they list but continue to call the shots. The regulator aims to fix that.

9 March, 20237 min
0
SEBI wants startups to name their promoters

Why read this story?

Editor's note: The Securities and Exchange Board of India wants founders with a 10% stake in their companies at the time of an IPO to classify themselves as promoters, according to a report in The Financial Express. The regulator’s move, if it takes effect, could have a bearing on a bunch of startups planning public issues of shares. With private equity investors holding the bulk of shares in many of them, founder stakes have come down to single digits. This will make it difficult to identify a promoter, and possibly delay the process. Also, there is no clarity on whether the new rule will allow clubbing together of founders to be counted as a single promoter. And, finally, can a founder opt out of being called a promoter if they pare their stake before an IPO? In 2019, faced with low founder/promoter stake in startups applying for IPOs, SEBI began drafting fresh rules. The rules allowed these startups to list as professionally managed companies, or PMCs, without anyone being classified as a promoter. It is under these rules that startups like Paytm, …

You may also like

Internet
Story image

PhonePe’s transition from payments to a financial services company is incomplete

The company’s IPO plans come amid weak numbers, slow growth of new platforms, challenges in its core payments business and a rather dull stock market.

Internet
Story image

Eternal, startups and playing the long game

In a country beset with problems, there is always something better to do. How about your duty to your shareholders first? Separately, Urban Company’s latest quarterly results show fatigue

Internet
Story image

Eternal’s leap of faith: exit Goyal, enter Dhindsa

Deepinder Goyal’s handing of Eternal’s reins to Albinder Dhindsa raises uncomfortable questions about timing, risk and whether shareholders are being asked to trust yet another reassuring narrative.