India is missing the forest for the trees

9 January, 20206 min
0
India is missing the forest for the trees

Why read this story?

Editor's note: On 30 December, Prakash Javadekar kickstarted a press conference with a two-volume, 604-page tome in his hands. It was the 2019 edition of the biennial India State of Forest Report, or ISFR, and it brought good tidings. 2019 had otherwise been a year of critical opprobrium for the newly inducted environment minister. He had promised to fast-track environmental clearances, backed the controversial felling of trees in Mumbai’s Aarey Colony and proclaimed there’s no link between pollution and shorter lifespans (which saw a sharp response from the World Health Organization). The 2019 forest report, then, was a bright spot to be paraded. There was an increase of 3,976 sq. km (or 0.6%) in forest cover compared to 2017. At first glance, 0.6% may seem miniscule, but any real growth in forest cover is good, and a few thousand square kilometres are nothing to sneeze at. Forests are vital to everything from maintaining biodiversity to combating climate change. There were losses, sure: 741 sq. km of forests in tribal districts, 765 sq. km across northeast India and 330 sq. km in reserve …

You may also like

Chaos
Story image

The 1.5°C limit has been breached. Where will COP take us next?

The window to prevent the worst impacts of climate change has shut. The heat is on global leaders at the annual climate talks in Brazil to deliver more than just theatre.

Business
Story image

Mumbai's worsening garbage crisis, and the company in the thick of it

The Kanjurmarg landfill, operated by Antony Waste Handling Cell Ltd., is safe from the axe for now. But its fate remains a major source of worry for the company's shareholders and the city's residents alike.

Business
Story image

It’s air purifiers, masks and tourism vs Delhi’s worsening air quality

An environmental hazard has spawned the need for these quick fixes, but do they really work?