/
•
•
Hyderabad-based company leaves out crucial details on promoter holding with zero consequences so far

Editor's note: The tale of Brightcom, its promoters and India's capital markets regulator is a story in three acts. One that reflects poorly on all involved. Act I What would you expect when a promoter group sells 90% of its stock in a company that has seen its share price rise very quickly and is currently under investigation by the securities regulator? At the very least there would be an exodus of investors and the company's shares would tank. Right? Well, the shares of Hyderabad-based digital marketing solutions company Brightcom Group, which is under a forensic audit by the Securities and Exchange Board of India, actually ended up rising. What’s your guess? That investors couldn’t get enough of Brightcom's exemplary growth story, which has already seen the stock move up from less than Rs 10 to Rs 145 in under a year? The answer is simpler. Information about Brightcom’s promoters’ stake sale never made it to websites of the stock exchanges, even though it is a mandatory disclosure for companies. The regulator’s rules explicitly state that if promoters sell their stake or …
The central bank’s shift to a 100% collateral requirement threatens to erode leverage, reduce volumes and force a consolidation across prop desks.
While the regulator’s interim order alleges massive irregularities, the long arc of unfinished probes, hearings and appeals makes closure distant.
As growth in equities cools, asset managers are looking to embed themselves in payrolls, payments, and credit. This raises their influence, but also the stakes.