RBI can’t wish away fintechs from UPI just yet

The central bank is worried about banks not doing enough to boost their market share vis-a-vis fintechs, but there is little incentive for private sector lenders to up their UPI game.

13 December, 20227 min
0
RBI can’t wish away fintechs from UPI just yet

Why read this story?

Editor's note: Reserve Bank of India deputy governor T. Rabi Sankar recently said at a conference hosted by the Indian Banks’ Association that banks have conceded the Unified Payments Interface market to a handful of fintech firms. “How is it that a system of transactions between two bank accounts has evolved in a way that most businesses are owned by non-banks? Clearly, banks have missed a step here.” The Times of India quoted Sankar as saying. “Probably the feeling that small-value transactions are an insignificant business to put your resources into.”  Interestingly, his comments came soon after the National Payments Corporation of India, or NPCI, extended the deadline for third-party apps to limit the market share of their UPI transactions to 30% of the total volume to December 2024. Sankar’s remarks elicited immediate responses from the industry, most notably from two banking and fintech veterans. Amrish Rau, chief executive of Pine Labs, tweeted: “It’s fashionable to beat up Banks. Fintechs (combined) would have invested north of 5Bn to drive UPI acceptance and issuance. Most banks are public[ly] listed and don’t have the …

You may also like

Business
Story image

Banking on growth in 2026

A tumultuous year comes to a close for Indian banks, as they await a revival in borrowing in the new year.

Internet
Story image

Is the cross-border payment aggregation wave here to stay?

Firms like Razorpay and Pine Labs are eyeing the lucrative international remittances market with their newly received cross-border payment aggregator licences. The opportunity, albeit large, is not without challenges.

Business
Story image

Amitabh Chaudhry needs to rethink Axis Mutual Fund’s revival strategy

The fund house has fallen behind its peers. What explains the sub-par performance?