Why peer-to-peer lending needs scrutiny
Quick to tie up with fintech startups, India’s P2P lending platforms have done little to address the lack of transparency about borrowers and links with dubious loan apps.

Why read this story?
Editor's note: Last week was particularly interesting for India’s peer-to-peer lending platforms. Two contrasting trends emerged. On Friday, fintech startup CRED announced that it will buy a minority stake in peer-to-peer lending platform LiquiLoans for $10 million (roughly Rs 80 crore), valuing it at $200 million. The move comes nearly a year after CRED partnered with the Mumbai-based P2P player to launch CRED Mint, a service that allows its customers to lend to one another through LiquiLoans at an interest rate of up to 9% annually. The same week, digital payments firm MobiKwik launched a similar feature on its app. The service, called Xtra, allows users to invest through P2P lending platform Lendbox and earn an interest of up to 12% annually. CRED and MobiKwik are not P2P lenders. They simply act as a channel for their P2P partners, which, in turn, get lenders—or investors—to pool their money to offer borrowers unsecured instant loans. Ever since the Reserve Bank of India recognized P2P lenders as non-banking financial companies in 2017, more than 25 such licensed platforms have come up in India. According …
More in Internet
You may also like
CSB Bank’s deposits are a ticking time bomb
The Kerala-based bank has been chasing costly and risky bulk term deposits amid tanking profitability.
Yes Bank’s succession problem is a board problem
As Prashant Kumar’s term runs out, boardroom fault lines have left the lender with no clarity on its next CEO—spooking investors and drawing the RBI’s ire.
Why IndusInd Bank promoter Ashok Hinduja was never really in the dark
As the private lender reeled from serial scandals, Hinduja insisted he was merely a shareholder. Board-level links, conflicts of interest and regulatory blind spots suggest otherwise.








