Shyam Srinivasan’s job at Federal Bank is only half done

The CEO may have turned around a bank that was in the grips of corruption at the grassroots, but can he make it one of India’s top five private banks?

8 December, 202210 min
0
Shyam Srinivasan’s job at Federal Bank is only half done

Why read this story?

Editor's note: Federal Bank chief executive Shyam Srinivasan isn’t happy. Since January, the bank’s shares may have soared 53%, almost 3x the growth in the Nifty Private Bank index. But he wants more.  “I still think we have not been rewarded as well as we should for the performance,” Srinivasan recently told The Economic Times.  The CEO of the Aluva-based bank has a point. With Srinivasan at the helm for the past 12 years, the private sector lender, once plagued by grassroots-level corruption and unionism, has grown its deposits 1.5x and advances 1.6x vis-a-vis the industry. However, during the same period, the bank’s stock jumped 322%, just short of the Nifty Private Bank index’s 359%. Based on the bank’s September-quarter results, brokerages still expect its shares to rise 10-31% from its current levels. The key question is: Are the markets not rewarding Federal Bank enough? Maybe. With a price-to-book ratio of 1.42, it is still undervalued compared with its peers—a chink in the bank’s otherwise impressive performance under Srinivasan. The ratio measures the market value of a company relative to its book …

You may also like

Business
Story image

CSB Bank’s deposits are a ticking time bomb

The Kerala-based bank has been chasing costly and risky bulk term deposits amid tanking profitability.

Business
Story image

Yes Bank’s succession problem is a board problem

As Prashant Kumar’s term runs out, boardroom fault lines have left the lender with no clarity on its next CEO—spooking investors and drawing the RBI’s ire.

Business
Story image

Why IndusInd Bank promoter Ashok Hinduja was never really in the dark

As the private lender reeled from serial scandals, Hinduja insisted he was merely a shareholder. Board-level links, conflicts of interest and regulatory blind spots suggest otherwise.