/
•
•
Context is everything.
Detailed stories on technology startups, business and economic current affairs.
Detailed stories on technology startups, business and economic current affairs.
Although the order was later revoked, the government’s use of the online content blocking law against licensed NBFCs without consulting the central bank was misguided.
Editor's note: Earlier this month, India’s fintech industry had a taste of the government’s heavy-handed approach towards perceived adversities. On 5 February, the Ministry of Electronics and Information Technology, on the recommendation of the Ministry of Home Affairs, moved to block 138 betting apps and 94 loan apps under Section 69A of the Information Technology Act, 2000. The move was reportedly triggered by concerns over possible Chinese links of some of these apps, suspected money laundering activities, users’ data security and non-compliance with digital lending laws. In the process, loan apps run by several non-banking financial companies regulated by the Reserve Bank of India also found themselves on the list. PayU’s LazyPay, Faircent, Kissht and IndiaBulls Home Loans saw their websites blocked right away. Others such as KreditBee, mPokket and TrueBalance were ordered to be taken down from app stores. In the subsequent days, senior executives from some of these firms were summoned by the government and asked to submit documents about their businesses’ shareholding patterns, data security measures and other compliance-related matters (the sequence of events was described in a story …
Although the order was later revoked, the government’s use of the online content blocking law against licensed NBFCs without consulting the central bank was misguided.
Editor's note: Earlier this month, India’s fintech industry had a taste of the government’s heavy-handed approach towards perceived adversities. On 5 February, the Ministry of Electronics and Information Technology, on the recommendation of the Ministry of Home Affairs, moved to block 138 betting apps and 94 loan apps under Section 69A of the Information Technology Act, 2000. The move was reportedly triggered by concerns over possible Chinese links of some of these apps, suspected money laundering activities, users’ data security and non-compliance with digital lending laws. In the process, loan apps run by several non-banking financial companies regulated by the Reserve Bank of India also found themselves on the list. PayU’s LazyPay, Faircent, Kissht and IndiaBulls Home Loans saw their websites blocked right away. Others such as KreditBee, mPokket and TrueBalance were ordered to be taken down from app stores. In the subsequent days, senior executives from some of these firms were summoned by the government and asked to submit documents about their businesses’ shareholding patterns, data security measures and other compliance-related matters (the sequence of events was described in a story …
The newly announced levy on UPI payments undermines the very foundation of using digital payments for stock market investing. Brokers are in a tizzy.
The Rs 250 SIP was launched last year by the former SEBI chairperson with one clear goal: financial inclusion. More than a year later, the much-hyped scheme doesn’t seem to have caught on with MF investors.
The central bank’s shift to a 100% collateral requirement threatens to erode leverage, reduce volumes and force a consolidation across prop desks.
The newly announced levy on UPI payments undermines the very foundation of using digital payments for stock market investing. Brokers are in a tizzy.
The Rs 250 SIP was launched last year by the former SEBI chairperson with one clear goal: financial inclusion. More than a year later, the much-hyped scheme doesn’t seem to have caught on with MF investors.
The central bank’s shift to a 100% collateral requirement threatens to erode leverage, reduce volumes and force a consolidation across prop desks.
